What action is permissible during "hot pursuit"?

During a "hot pursuit," law enforcement officers are permitted to arrest suspects in any location. This principle is rooted in the need to prevent suspects from evading law enforcement and to protect public safety. The concept of hot pursuit allows officers to pursue a fleeing suspect without having to secure a warrant, under the premise that immediate action is necessary to apprehend an individual who is actively fleeing from law enforcement.

The rationale behind allowing arrests in any location during hot pursuit is based on the urgency of the situation. When an officer is in hot pursuit, they are responding to a situation where immediate action is required, such as chasing a suspect who has just committed a crime and is attempting to flee to avoid arrest. This necessity overrides the usual warrant requirement, enabling officers to make an arrest on private property or in public places alike as long as the pursuit is continuous and does not allow the suspect to escape.

Other actions, such as entering any property to search for evidence, conducting a traffic stop without probable cause, or searching a vehicle already stopped by another officer, do not uphold the same principle of necessity and may violate constitutional protections in terms of unlawful search and seizure. Each of these actions requires different standards of justification, such as consent, probable cause, or reasonable suspicion,